1
Corinthians Chapter 4.
Paul and his fellow-ministers were accountable to the Lord
and not to men. 4:1-5.
The practical application of these principles to the
Corinthians. 4:6-7.
A glutted triumph distinguished the Corinthians from the
apostles
and their humiliation. 4
:18-13.
Paul was their spiritual father, so had relationship to
them that
was not
shared by other teachers. 4:14-21.
A true account
of the apostolic missionaries:
1/ Their
responsibility to God.
Their true status as ministers of Christ. They were stewards of the Mysteries of
God. Their central qualification, and
the qualities demanded of stewards were not those that the Corinthians had
associated with their party-leaders. The
Lord alone could determine the qualities he required of His servants. Their final and competent judgement was in
that each man that deserves praise shall receive it from God and not from
man. The Divine character of the
judgment is underlined.
2/ Their Otherworldliness. The Corinthians were mistaken as to the
nature of the service of Christ. They
thought of Christianity in terms of self-sufficiency, ease, luxury and worldly
respectability. Paul underlines the many
hardships the service of Christ meant for the apostles. He is fully aware that the self-satisfaction
of the Corinthians was an empty boast.
3/ The Special relationship of Paul to the
Corinthians. Since he had
evangelised them, he was their spiritual father and not a mere
child-leader. As their spiritual father,
he had the right to admonish, to be imitated, and to discipline when he came to
them.
Allusions to
two features of pagan life.
The group of doomed men who brought up the rear of a Roman
Triumph. 4:9. The offering of human sacrifices to the gods
in times of national calamity, when the despised of the land were offered. 4:13.
Summary: The Corinthians (chapters 1-4) misunderstood
three things:
a/ The nature of the Gospel, it was not of human philosophy.
b/ The nature of the apostolic ministry, the apostles were
neither rival leaders nor teachers of worldly wisdom.
c/ The nature of their own position, their claim to be wise
was self-delusion, and they were in no way competent to criticize Paul.
No comments:
Post a Comment